Duration of the patient interval in breast cancer and factors associated with longer delays in low‐and middle‐income countries: A systematic review with meta‐analysis
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Petrova, Dafina; Garrido del Águila, Dunia; Špacírová, Zuzana; Fernández Martínez, Nicolás Francisco; Rodríguez Barranco, Miguel; Barrios Rodríguez, Rocío; Sánchez Pérez, María JoséEditorial
Wiley
Materia
Cancer Early diagnosis Help‐seeking Low‐ and middle‐income countries Oncology Patient interval Psycho-oncology Psychosocial determinants
Date
2022-11-07Referencia bibliográfica
Petrova, D... [et al.]. Duration of the patient interval in breast cancer and factors associated with longer delays in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2022; 1- 12. [https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6064]
Sponsorship
Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica; Agencia Estatal de Investigacion; Fundacion Cientifica Asociacion Espanola Contra el CancerAbstract
Objective: Breast cancer survival is lower in low‐ and middle‐income countries
(LMICs) partially due to many women being diagnosed with late‐stage disease. The
patient interval refers to the time elapsed between the detection of symptoms and
the first consultation with a healthcare provider and is considered one of the core
indicators for early diagnosis and treatment. The goal of the current research was to
conduct a meta‐analysis of the duration of the patient interval in LMICs and
investigate the socio‐demographic and socio‐cultural factors related to longer delays
in presentation.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review with meta‐analysis (pre‐registered
protocol CRD42020200752). We searched seven information sources (2009–2022)
and included 50 articles reporting the duration of patient intervals for 18,014
breast cancer patients residing in LMICs.
Results: The longest patient intervals were reported in studies from the Middle East
(3–4 months), followed by South‐East Asia (2 months), Africa (1–2 months), Latin
America (1 month), and Eastern Europe (1 month). Older age, not being married,
lower socio‐economic status, illiteracy, low knowledge about cancer, disregarding
symptoms or not attributing them to cancer, fear, negative beliefs about cancer, and
low social support were related to longer delays across most regions. Longer delays
were also related to use of alternative medicine in the Middle East, South‐East Asia,
and Africa and distrust in the healthcare system in Eastern Europe.
Conclusions: There is large variation in the duration of patient intervals across
LMICs in different geographical regions. Patient intervals should be reduced and, for
this purpose, it is important to explore their determinants taking into account the
social, cultural, and economic context.