An Overview of Alternative Rule Evaluation Criteria and Their Use in Separate-and-Conquer Classifiers
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/77892Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Springer
Materia
Inteligencia artificial Artificial intelligence
Fecha
2006Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Berzal, F... [et al.] (2006). An Overview of Alternative Rule Evaluation Criteria and Their Use in Separate-and-Conquer Classifiers. In: Esposito, F., Raś, Z.W., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_66]
Resumen
Separate-and-conquer classifiers strongly depend on the criteria
used to choose which rules will be included in the classification
model. When association rules are employed to build such classifiers (as
in ART [3]), rule evaluation can be performed attending to different criteria
(other than the traditional confidence measure used in association
rule mining). In this paper, we analyze the desirable properties of such
alternative criteria and their effect in building rule-based classifiers using
a separate-and-conquer strategy.