Preliminary Results on the Preinduction Cervix Status by Shear Wave Elastography
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Torres Pérez, Jorge; Muñoz, María; Porcel, María del Carmen; Contreras, Sofía; Sonia Molina, Francisca; Rus Carlborg, Guillermo; Ocón Hernández, Olga; Melchor Rodríguez, Juan ManuelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Induction of labor Shear wave elastography Cervix Shear wave velocity
Date
2022-09-02Referencia bibliográfica
Torres, J... [et al.]. Preliminary Results on the Preinduction Cervix Status by Shear Wave Elastography. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3164. [https://doi.org/10.3390/math10173164]
Sponsorship
Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte grant DPI2017-83859-R DPI2014-51870-R UNGR15-CE-3664 EQC2018-004508-P; Spanish Government DTS15/00093 PI16/00339; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Government; European Commission PID2020-115372RB-I00 PYC20 RE 072 UGR; Instituto de Salud Carlos III y Fondos Feder; Junta de Andalucia PI-0107-2017 PIN-0030-2017 IE2017-5537 B-TEP-026-UGR18 P18-RT-1653; MCIN/AEI (European Social Fund "Investing in your future") PRE2018-086085; European Commission P18-RT-1653 SOMM17/6109/UGRAbstract
The mechanical status of the cervix is a key physiological element during pregnancy.
By considering a successful induction when the active phase of labor is achieved, mapping the
mechanical properties of the cervix could have predictive potential for the management of induction
protocols. In this sense, we performed a preliminary assessment of the diagnostic value of using
shear wave elastography before labor induction in 54 women, considering the pregnancy outcome
and Cesarean indications. Three anatomical cervix regions and standard methods, such as cervical
length and Bishop score, were compared. To study the discriminatory power of each diagnostic
method, a receiver operating characteristic curve was generated. Differences were observed using
the external os region and cervical length in the failure to enter the active phase group compared to
the vaginal delivery group (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve resulted in 68.9%, 65.2% and
67.2% for external os, internal os and cervix box using elastography, respectively, compared to 69.5%
for cervical length and 62.2% for Bishop score. External os elastography values have shown promise
in predicting induction success. This a priori information could be used to prepare a study with a
larger sample size, which would reduce the effect of any bias selection and increase the predictive
power of elastography compared to other classical techniques.