Social mentalizing in male perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women is associated with resting-state functional connectivity of the Crus II
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Intimate partner violence against women Male perpetrators Social mentalizing Resting-state functional connectivity Crus II
Date
2022-03-26Referencia bibliográfica
Sofia Amaoui... [et al.]. Social mentalizing in male perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women is associated with resting-state functional connectivity of the Crus II, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Volume 150, 2022, Pages 264-271, ISSN 0022-3956, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.03.044]
Patrocinador
General Secretary of Penitentiary Institutions, Ministerio del Interior, SpainRésumé
Social mentalizing refers to the ability to understand the intentions, causes, emotions and beliefs of another
person or the self and is crucial for interpersonal understanding. Disturbances in this process may lead to
aggressive and violent behaviors. Literature has shown that male perpetrators convicted for intimate partner
crime (IPVAW) present alterations in different measures related to social mentalizing, in particular, they present
more irrational thoughts toward women and difficulties in emotional recognition and empathy processes.
However, the brain mechanisms underlying this process are still unknown. The aim of this study is to examine
the resting-state functional connectivity of the cerebellar Crus II area, as a core component of social mentalizing
in male perpetrators, and to explore if this connectivity is associated with social mentalizing processes. To
achieve these objectives, we compared the resting-state connectivity of 25 men convicted for an IPVAW crime
(male perpetrators) with 29 men convicted for other crimes (other offenders) and 28 men with no criminal
records (non-offenders) using a seed-based whole brain analysis. Subsequently, correlations were performed to
explore the association between the significant connectivity networks and social mentalizing measures only in
male perpetrators of IPVAW. Analyses showed that male perpetrators of IPVAW exhibit hyperconnectivity between
Crus II and posterior areas of the default mode network, frontoparietal and limbic areas compared to other
offenders and non-offenders. In addition, the greater connectivity found between the Crus II and the posterior
default mode network was related to a greater number of distorted thoughts about women and less affective
empathy in male perpetrators of IPVAW. These results show that connectivity between the cerebellum and the
default mode network may underlie the social processes that are at the basis of intimate partner violence
perpetration.