Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPérez Troncoso, Daniel 
dc.contributor.authorEpstein, David Mark 
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda García, José Alberto 
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-11T11:33:38Z
dc.date.available2022-01-11T11:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPublisher version: Pérez-Troncoso, D., Epstein, D.M. & Castañeda-García, J.A. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Personalised Nutrition. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 19, 757–767 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00647-3es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/72306
dc.descriptionWe wish to thank the entire Stance4Health team for their support, Professors Joan Gil and Miguel A. Negrin for their helpful suggestions at the EEconAES Workshop and AESEC session, and Daniel Hinojosa for providing a professional nutritionist's point of viewes_ES
dc.descriptionData and Stata code: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/kh2btj3btj.1es_ES
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Personalised nutrition (PN) has great potential for disease prevention, particularly if coupled with the power and accessibility of mobile technology. However, success of PN interventions will depend on the willingness of users to subscribe. This study investigates the factors associated with potential users' perceived value of PN and heterogeneity in these values. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was carried out in a representative sample (N=429 valid responses) from the adult population in Spain. The results were analysed in line with McFadden's Random Utility Theory, using conditional and mixed logit models in addition to a latent class logit model. Results: The conditional and mixed logit models revealed the existence of a significant preference and willingness to pay for personalized nutrition, but the effect on average was not large for the highest level of personalization. The latent class logit revealed four classes of respondent: those who would be likely to pay for a high level of personalized nutrition service, those who would use it if it were heavily subsidized, those who would use only a basic nutrition service, and those who would not be willing to engage. These results could be useful for the design and targeting of effective personalized nutrition services. Conclusions: Over half of adults currently perceive some individual benefit in a high level of PN, which may justify some degree of public subsidy in investment and delivery of such a service.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.subjectPersonalised nutritiones_ES
dc.subjectWillingness to payes_ES
dc.subjectNoncommunicable diseases preventiones_ES
dc.subjectDiscrete choice experimentes_ES
dc.titleConsumers' preferences and willingness to pay for personalised nutritiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40258-021-00647-3
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License