Tomb Location and Grave Goods: Continuous Use and Destruction in the Rio de Gor Megalithic Necropoleis
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Spanedda, Liliana; Afonso Marrero, José Andrés; Cámara Serrano, Juan Antonio; Molina González, Fernando; Montufo Martín, Antonio Manuel; Pau, Claudia; Haro Navarro, MartínEditorial
Archaeopress
Materia
Sudeste de la Península Ibérica Southeastern Iberia Megalitos Megaliths Control del territorio Territorial control Cultura de Los Millares Los Millares Culture Reutilización de megalitos Reuse of megaliths Ajuares funerarios Grave goods
Date
2014Referencia bibliográfica
SPANEDDA, L., AFONSO MARRERO, J.A., CÁMARA SERRANO, J.A., MOLINA GONZÁLEZ, F., MONTUFO MARTÍN, A.M., PAU, C., HARO NAVARRO, M. (2014): Tomb Location and Grave Goods: Continuous Use and Destruction in the Rio de Gor Megalithic Necropoleis, Neolithic and Copper Age Monuments: Emergence, function and the social construction of the landscape (B. Schulz Paulsson, B. Gaydarska, Eds.), British Archaeological Reports. International Series 2625, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 107-124.
Sponsorship
Consejería de Cultura de la Junta de AndalucíaAbstract
Rio de Gor Megalithic necropoleis are one of the most important funerary clusters in Southern Iberian Peninsula. We
attempted to study megalith and settlement characteristics in relation to social organization according to the scarce and
old available data. Firstly, an evaluation of previous unsystematic surveys and looters destructions of monuments has
been made by taking into account location of preserved tombs. Visibility GIS analysis, with the help of ancient
cartographic data, have let us to suggest a hypothetical location of graves that have disappeared. GIS techniques have
been used to geo-reference old archaeological maps in order to identify their approximate position. Secondly, analysis
of topographic location, Total Viewshed and Cumulative Viewshed Analysis using GIS was performed to evaluate the
role of visual dominance over the entire terrain. The results have shown that graves were used to mark routes in two
ways, from South to North along the river course and from the valley to the plateau. Settlements were located near the
valley bottom although there are some chronological and hierarchical differences. Thirdly, we have seen that tombs
were not only used for a long period of time but also that they were probably arranged in groups around some of the
most monumental examples, those containing rich grave goods and marking the river course in the Chalcolithic period.
Probably routes from the valley to the plateau were generated by the addition of tombs from the beginning of the Late
Neolithic and the system was completed with the building of great trapezoidal tombs during the third millennium BC.
Fourthly, tomb reuse has been proven in the Middle and the Late Bronze Age, when there was not only pursuit for
justification by tradition but also redefinition of territorial control linked to elite. This is shown by the fact that the Late
Bronze Age use of the megaliths was only in relation to rich burials as can be inferred from the great amount of silver
ornaments they contain.