Frailty, Complexity, and Priorities in the Use of Advanced Palliative Care Resources in Nursing Homes
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Mota Romero, Emilio; Tallón Martín, Beatriz; García Ruiz, María P.; Puente Fernández, Daniel; García Caro, María Paz; Montoya Juárez, RafaelEditorial
Mdpi
Materia
Frailty Complexity Prognosis Palliative care Palliative care complexity Nursing homes Patient transfer
Date
2021-01-14Referencia bibliográfica
Mota-Romero, E.; Tallón-Martín, B.; García-Ruiz, M.P.; Puente-Fernandez, D.; García-Caro, M.P.; Montoya-Juarez, R. Frailty, Complexity, and Priorities in the Use of Advanced Palliative Care Resources in Nursing Homes. Medicina 2021, 57, 70. [https://doi.org/medicina57010070]
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aimed to determine the frailty, prognosis, complexity,
and palliative care complexity of nursing home residents with palliative care needs and define the
characteristics of the cases eligible for receiving advanced palliative care according to the resources
available at each nursing home. Materials and Methods: In this multi-centre, descriptive, and crosssectional
study, trained nurses from eight nursing homes in southern Spain selected 149 residents with
palliative care needs. The following instruments were used: the Frail-VIG index, the case complexity
index (CCI), the Diagnostic Instrument of Complexity in Palliative Care (IDC-Pal), the palliative
prognosis index, the Barthel index (dependency), Pfeiffer’s test (cognitive impairment), and the
Charlson comorbidity index. A consensus was reached on the complexity criteria of the Diagnostic
Instrument of Complexity in Palliative Care that could be addressed in the nursing home (no priority)
and those that required a one-off (priority 2) or full (priority 1) intervention of advanced palliative care
resources. Non-parametric tests were used to compare non-priority patients and patients with some
kind of priority. Results: A high percentage of residents presented frailty (80.6%), clinical complexity
(80.5%), and palliative care complexity (65.8%). A lower percentage of residents had a poor prognosis
(10.1%) and an extremely poor prognosis (2%). Twelve priority 1 and 14 priority 2 elements were
identified as not matching the palliative care complexity elements that had been previously identified.
Of the studied cases, 20.1% had priority 1 status and 38.3% had priority 2 status. Residents with
some kind of priority had greater levels of dependency (p < 0.001), cognitive impairment (p < 0.001),
and poorer prognoses (p < 0.001). Priority 1 patients exhibited higher rates of refractory delirium
(p = 0.003), skin ulcers (p = 0.041), and dyspnoea (p = 0.020). Conclusions: The results indicate that
there are high levels of frailty, clinical complexity, and palliative care complexity in nursing homes.
The resources available at each nursing home must be considered to determine when advanced
palliative care resources are required.