MGMT promoter methylation status and MGMT and CD133 immunohistochemical expression as prognostic markers in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide plus radiotherapy
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Melguizo Alonso, Consolación; Prados Salazar, José Carlos; Alvarez, Pablo Juan; Perazzoli, Gloria; Oliver, Jaime Antonio; López, Rodrigo; Rodríguez Serrano, Fernando; Aránega Jiménez, AntoniaEditorial
Elsevier SCI LTD
Materia
Glioblastoma Radiotherapy Temozolomide MGMT Methylation CD133
Date
2012-12-17Referencia bibliográfica
Melguizo, C., Prados, J., González, B., Ortiz, R., Concha, A., Alvarez, P. J., ... & Rodríguez-Serrano, F. (2012). MGMT promoter methylation status and MGMT and CD133 immunohistochemical expression as prognostic markers in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide plus radiotherapy. Journal of translational medicine, 10(1), 250. [doi:10.1186/1479-5876-10-250]
Sponsorship
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS) PI11/01862; Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía PI-0338Abstract
Background: The CD133 antigen is a marker of radio- and chemo-resistant stem cell populations in glioblastoma
(GBM). The O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) enzyme is related with temozolomide (TMZ)
resistance. Our propose is to analyze the prognostic significance of the CD133 antigen and promoter methylation
and protein expression of MGMT in a homogenous group of GBM patients uniformly treated with radiotherapy and
TMZ. The possible connection between these GBM markers was also investigated.
Methods: Seventy-eight patients with GBM treated with radiotherapy combined with concomitant and adjuvant
TMZ were analyzed for MGMT and CD133. MGMT gene promoter methylation was determined by
methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction after bisulfite treatment. MGMT and CD133 expression was assessed
immunohistochemically using an automatic quantification system. Overall and progression-free survival was
calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method.
Results: The MGMT gene promoter was found to be methylated in 34 patients (44.7%) and unmethylated in 42
patients (55.3%). A significant correlation was observed between MGMT promoter methylation and patients’
survival. Among the unmethylated tumors, 52.4% showed low expression of MGMT and 47.6% showed highexpression.
Among methylated tumors, 58.8% showed low-expression of MGMT and 41.2% showed highexpression.
No correlation was found between MGMT promoter methylation and MGMT expression, or MGMT
expression and survival. In contrast with recent results, CD133 expression was not a predictive marker in GBM
patients. Analyses of possible correlation between CD133 expression and MGMT protein expression or MGMT
promoter methylation were negative.
Conclusions: Our results support the hypothesis that MGMT promoter methylation status but not MGMT
expression may be a predictive biomarker in the treatment of patients with GBM. In addition, CD133 should not be
used for prognostic evaluation of these patients. Future studies will be necessary to determine its clinical utility