Review of Terms and Definitions Used in Descriptions of Running Shoes
Metadata
Show full item recordEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Footwear Sports shoes Running shoes Conventional running shoes Minimalist running shoes Barefoot running Motion control shoes
Date
2020-05Referencia bibliográfica
Marchena-Rodriguez, A., Ortega-Avila, A. B., Cervera-Garvi, P., Cabello-Manrique, D., & Gijon-Nogueron, G. (2020). Review of Terms and Definitions Used in Descriptions of Running Shoes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3562. [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103562]
Abstract
Objective: Our study aim is to identify and describe the definitions used for different types
of running shoes. In addition, we highlight the existence of gaps in these concepts and propose
possible new approaches. Methods: This review was undertaken in line with the guidelines proposed
by Green et al., based on a literature search (until December 2019) of the PubMed, Web of Science,
Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar databases. A total of 23 papers met the inclusion criteria
applied to identify the definition of running shoes. Results: Although there is a certain consensus on
the characteristics of minimalist footwear, it is also described by other terms, such as barefoot-style
or barefoot-simulating. Diverse terms are also used to describe other types of footwear, and in
these cases, there is little or no consensus regarding their characteristics. Conclusions: The terms
barefoot-simulated footwear, barefoot-style footwear, lightweight shoes and full minimalist shoes are
all used to describe minimalist footwear. The expressions partial minimalist, uncushioned minimalist
and transition shoes are used to describe footwear with non-consensual characteristics. Finally, labels
such as shod shoes, standard cushioned running shoes, modern shoes, neutral protective running
shoes, conventional, standardised, stability style or motion control shoes span a large group of
footwear styles presenting different properties.