Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTorres-Luque, Gema
dc.contributor.authorFernández García, Ángel Iván
dc.contributor.authorBlanca Torres, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorKondric, Miran
dc.contributor.authorCabello Manrique, David 
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-24T11:38:59Z
dc.date.available2020-04-24T11:38:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-03
dc.identifier.citationTorres-Luque G, Fernández-García ÁI, Blanca-Torres JC, Kondric M and Cabello-Manrique D (2019) Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games. Front. Psychol. 10:731.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/61584
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men’s singles; 108 sets in women’s singles; 77 sets in men’s doubles; 73 in women’s doubles and 70 in mixed doubles) from the RIO 2016 Olympics Games were recorded and classified in two groups of variables to analyze variables related to match (5) and set (15). A descriptive analysis and univariate test (Mann–Whitney U) for non-parametric data were conducted. The results show in men’s and women’s singles all the variables related to match were higher in the Elimination Phase than in the Group Phase (p < 0.01). In Sets 1 and 3, the longest set duration, rally and average rally were found in the Elimination Phase than Group Stage (p < 0.05). In women’s singles, these differences were also recorded in Set 2. For doubles, the results are more stable among groups. Men’s doubles had a longer duration of the match and set (sets 1 and set 2) (p < 0.01), and also scored highest for average rally strokes (sets 1 3) (p < 0.05) and shuttles used in the Elimination Phase vs. the Group Phase along the match (p < 0.01). In women’s doubles, more shuttles were used in a match in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. Moreover, the same results are established for Set 2, including for average rally. Mixed doubles saw no match going to three sets. However, the greatest differences showed a longer rally and average rally being registered in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. In conclusion, the timing factors of the badminton singles and doubles games were different in the Elimination and Group Phases. This information may help players and coaches prepare and administer different types of workouts or, more specifically, competition schedules adapted to the characteristics of modern badminton.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers in Mediaes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectNotational Analysises_ES
dc.subjectMatch analysises_ES
dc.subjectRacket Sportses_ES
dc.subjectPerformance indicatorses_ES
dc.subjectPerformance analysises_ES
dc.subjectBadminton es_ES
dc.titleStatistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Gameses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00731


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 3.0 España