• English 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
View Item 
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Derecho Internacional Privado e Historia del Derecho
  • DDIPHD - Capítulos de Libros
  • View Item
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Derecho Internacional Privado e Historia del Derecho
  • DDIPHD - Capítulos de Libros
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Challenges for the Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Spain

[PDF] capitulo de libro OUP.pdf (404.3Kb)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/44412
ISBN: 9780198766353
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Esteban De La Rosa, Fernando
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Materia
Spanish CADR system,
 
Adaptation to EU law
 
Public ADR entities
 
Private ADR entities
 
Consumer Associations
 
Ombudsmen
 
Principle of independency
 
Principle of liberty
 
Principle of legality
 
Principle of fairness
 
Principle of transparency
 
Date
2016
Referencia bibliográfica
Esteban de la Rosa, F. Challenges for the Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Spain. En: Pablo Cortés (ed.). The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution. London: Oxford University Press, 2016; pp: 275-296. [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/4441]
Abstract
The aim of the chapter is to analyse the challenges that the Spanish legislation will have to overcome in order to adapt to the new European Law on CADR. Spain counts with a long way experience in CADR consisting both in public and private ADR entities. In the public field the main role belongs to arbitration (the SCAS) and mediation (the OMICs), extended over the whole geography. Apparently this situation puts Spanish legislation in a good starting point for the adaptation. A closer look reveals, however, that every territorial entity (both CAB and OMICs) does not depart from the same position in order to reach the fulfilling of the European standards. Its decentralized character could orientate solutions towards a deep reform of the system to make it possible for every single entity (OMIC or CAB) to obtain its own accreditation. The legislator seems also willing to increase the role of private ADR, and also Ombudsmen paid directly by the trader, but only to some extent. This position counts today with the objection of many of the stakeholders. The Draft also leaves many questions waiting for answers by the future legislation. The chapter highlights some of the decisions the Spanish legislator should take when adapting the CADR system to the new European law.
Collections
  • DDIPHD - Capítulos de Libros

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Justifying the Precautionary Principle as a political principle 

    Bermejo Luque, Lilian; Rodríguez Alcázar, Francisco Javier (2023-05-11)
  • Tendencias en la negociación colectiva respecto al empleo de personas con discapacidad en Andalucía 

    Almendros González, Miguel Ángel (2023)
  • Leibniz frente al ocasionalismo. La lucha por la autonomía de la razón 

    Nicolás Marín, Juan Antonio (2021-10-19)

My Account

LoginRegister

Browse

All of DIGIBUGCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciaciónAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciación

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contact Us | Send Feedback