Standards for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Quality Improvement Registries: A Delphi Consensus Report From VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteAuteur
Grima, Matthew Joe; Ancetti, Stefano; Pherwani, Arun; Gonçalves, Frederico B.; Budtz-Lilly, Jacob; Behrendt, Christian-Alexander; Scali, Salvatore T.; Beck, Adam W.; Mani, Kevin; ASCUNET/ICVR AAAEditorial
Elsevier
Date
2025-04-25Referencia bibliográfica
Matthew Joe Grima et al. Standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair quality improvement registries. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Volume 69, Issue 4, April 2025, Pages 516-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.12.002
Résumé
Objective: Outcome registries in vascular surgery are used increasingly to drive quality improvement by vascular
societies. The VASCUNET collaboration, within the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS), and the
International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR) developed a set of variables for quality improvement
registries on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair as a registry standard.
Methods: Representatives from international vascular registries within VASCUNET, ICVR, and other nations with
established registries were invited to provide the variables. The final variables were developed through a two
stage modified Delphi process. Variables from the established registries with at least 60% consensus among
all the registries were included for round 1. A five point Likert scale (strongly disagree to fully agree) was
used. If the limit of consensual agreement was not reached in round 1, the variable was discussed again in
round 2. For round 2, an array question method (yes, no to unsure) was used. Agreement of at least 70%
resulted in the variable being included in the final dataset.
Results: A total of 88 of 371 variables extracted from all AAA registries were circulated in the modified Delphi
process as they reached the 60% consensus threshold. The questionnaire was circulated to 55 participants
(round 1: 49; 89%; round 2: 43; 78%). After two rounds, 70 variables were recommended on consensual
agreement. These variables comprised demographics (n ¼ 4), pre-operative information (n ¼ 28), intra-
operative variables (n ¼ 18), post-operative variables (n ¼ 5), and follow up (n ¼ 13).
Conclusion: Based on this modified Delphi process, an international panel of vascular surgeons representing
quality improvement registries recommended 70 core variables as standard in AAA repair registries. The
inclusion of a core set of variables in AAA vascular registries may help to further harmonise observational
research and quality of AAA repair among global healthcare systems