• English 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
View Item 
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva
  • DEFD - Artículos
  • View Item
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva
  • DEFD - Artículos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessment of the force-velocity relationship during vertical jumps: influence of the starting position, analysis procedures and number of loads

[PDF] 104.pdf (1.320Mb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/100462
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1645886
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Janicijevic, Danica; Knezevic, Olivera; Mirkov, Dragan; Pérez Castilla, Alejandro; Petrovic, Milos; Samozino, Pierre; García Ramos, Amador
Date
2020-06
Referencia bibliográfica
Janicijevic, D., Knezevic, O., Mirkov, D., Pérez-Castilla, A., Petrovic, M., Samozino, P., García-Ramos, A. (2020). Assessment of the force-velocity relationship during vertical jumps: influence of the starting position, analysis procedures and number of loads. European Journal of Sport Science, 20(5), 614-623.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the reliability and magnitude of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship parameters between the squat jumps performed from the 90° (SJ90) and self-preferred knee angle (SJpref). A secondary aim was to explore the effect of the analysis procedure (force platform [FP] and Samozino’s [SAM] method) and the number of loads tested (three- and two-point methods) on the F-V relationships. Twelve men were tested in two sessions during the SJ90 and SJpref. Two identical blocks of jumps were performed in each session against three external loads. The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope and maximum power) were determined at each block through the FP and SAM procedures using the data collected under three (three-point method) or only the two most distant loads (two-point method). The average coefficient of variation (CV) of the four F-V parameters revealed a higher reliability for the SJ90 compared to the SJpref (5.86% vs. 7.55%; CVratio= 1.29) with more pronounced differences using the FP (CVratio= 1.43) than the SAM procedure (CVratio= 1.14), and higher reliability for the SAM compared to the FP (6.14% vs. 7.27%; CVratio= 1.18). The SJpref and SAM procedures provided comparable or higher magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters than the SJ90 and FP, respectively. The three- and two-point methods revealed a comparable reliability and trivial differences in the magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters. The routine testing procedure of the F-V relationship could be simplified using the SJpref, the SAM procedure and the two-point method.
Collections
  • DEFD - Artículos

My Account

LoginRegister

Browse

All of DIGIBUGCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciaciónAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciación

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contact Us | Send Feedback