@misc{10481/85898,
year = {2022},
month = {9},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/85898},
abstract = {Nitrate pollution of groundwater, mainly from agricultural applications, is a widespread water quality problem in many countries. The aim of this study was to identify and compare the main environmental impacts and costs associated with removing nitrate from groundwater under a conventional treatment technology and a technology based on a biological treatment process (denitrification using aerobic granular sludge). The analysis focused on the first real-world experience of an industrial-scale implementation of said technology, applied to the drinking water supply in a small town in Spain. The methods selected for the environmental and economic evaluations were life cycle assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis, respectively. The drinking water treatment technologies under study were a conventional reverse osmosis plant and a plant using a biological treatment called ecogranularwater. The analysis of these two drinking water production processes was divided into two phases: structure and water treatment. This study demonstrates that the biological technology produces drinking water in a more environmentally-friendly, cost-effective way, and with lower energy costs. The greatest environmental impacts from the reverse osmosis technology occurred in the water treatment phase due to the high levels of energy consumption (up to 1.68 kWh m-3 higher than with the ecogranularwater technology). In the structure phase, the biological technology contributed more than reverse osmosis in all impact categories, with values ranging from 91% in freshwater ecotoxicity to 98% in stratospheric ozone depletion. The cost of producing 1 m3 of water was estimated as 43% lower with the ecogranularwater technology compared to reverse osmosis. In order to further lessen the environmental impact of the biological technology, efforts should be focused on reducing and optimizing energy use and making improvements to the design of the structure. This biological technology proved a good alternative for small and medium-sized municipalities with problems of nitrate-polluted water. The decision to apply technological innovations in drinking water treatments to remove nitrates can be supported by environmental and economic studies.},
organization = {European Commission},
organization = {European Regional Development Fund},
organization = {Regional Government of Andalusia},
publisher = {Elsevier},
keywords = {Life cycle assessmen},
keywords = {Nitrate-polluted wate},
keywords = {Drinking water},
keywords = {Environmental footprint},
keywords = {Cost-effectiveness analysis},
keywords = {Biological treatment},
title = {Biological nitrate removal from a drinking water supply with an aerobic granular sludge technology: An environmental and economic assessment},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133059},
author = {Alguacil Duarte, Fernando and González Gómez, Francisco José and Romero Gámez, Mercedes},
}