Scientifically Together, Politically Apart? Epistemological Literacy Predicts Updating on Contested Science Issues Viciana, Hugo M. Astobiza, Aníbal Fasce, Angelo Rodríguez Hannikainen, Ivar Allan Science education is generally perceived as a key facilitator in cultivating a scientifically literate society. In the last decade, however, this conventional wisdom has been challenged by evidence that greater scientific literacy and critical thinking skills may in fact inadvertently aggravate polarization on scientific matters in the public sphere. Supporting an alternative “scientific update hypothesis,” in a series of studies (total N = 2087), we show that increased science’s epistemology literacy might have consequential population-level effects on the public’s alignment with scientific results. In one exploratory study and a pre-registered national online survey, we first show that understanding scientific epistemology predicts refusal of pseudoscientific beliefs and higher scores in a methodology of science test. We also find and replicate a propensity for epistemologically literate citizens to endorse the norm of belief updating and the communicated scientific consensus following both ideologically congruent and incongruent scientific results. Notably, after 2 months of first being presented with scientific results on politically controversial issues, a one standard deviation higher score in epistemological literacy is associated with a 14% increase in the odds of individuals switching their beliefs to align with the scientifically communicated consensus. We close by discussing how, on the face of ideological incongruity, a general understanding of scientific epistemology might foster the acceptance of scientific results, and we underscore the need for a more nuanced appreciation of how education, public comprehension of scientific knowledge, and the dynamics of polarization intersect in the public sphere. 2024-12-20T12:38:33Z 2024-12-20T12:38:33Z 2024-11-28 journal article Viciana, H. et. al. Sci & Educ (2024). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00587-z] https://hdl.handle.net/10481/98372 10.1007/s11191-024-00587-z eng info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/964728 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ open access Atribución 4.0 Internacional Springer Nature