Validity and reliability of velocity and power measures provided by the Vitruve linear position transducer Ruiz Alías, Santiago Alejo Şentürk, Deniz Akyildiz, Zeki Çetin, Onat Kaya, Selman Pérez Castilla, Alejandro Jukic, Ivan This study aimed to determine the validity and between-day reliability of the mean velocity (MV), peak velocity (PV), mean power (MP), and peak power (PP) provided by the Vitruve linear position transducer at different submaximal loads in the free-weight and Smith machine back squat using GymAware as a reference point. Fourteen male sports science students (free-weight back squat one-repetition maximum [1RM]: 132.5 ± 28.5 kg, Smith machine back squat 1RM: 163.9 ± 30.4 kg) performed six experimental sessions, twice per week with 72 hours of rest. The first two included the assessment of the 1RM of both exercises. In the four remaining, both linear position transducers were simultaneously used to record MV, PV, MP, PP of each repetition during an incremental load test (i.e., 20, 40, 60, 80, 90% 1RM) with three minutes of rest between sets. Vitruve displayed both fixed and proportional bias for certain relative loads across all variables. Vitruve did not meet the validity criteria for all (MV, PP) or at least two (MP, PV) relative loads (Coefficient of variation [CV] > 10%; Pearson correlation < 0.70; Effect size > 0.60). MV, PV, MP, and PP recorded by Vitruve displayed acceptable reliability (CV < 10%) with superior reliability observed during a Smith Machine compared to free-weight back squat, and for velocity compared to power variables. Considering GymAware as a reference point, Vitruve was not valid for measuring velocity and power outcomes. Acceptable validity was observed only for PV in the Smith machine back squat, while the other variables—regardless of relative loads and exercise modes—were mostly inaccurate. All variables demonstrated acceptable reliability, with greater reliability noted in the Smith machine compared to the free-weight back squat exercise mode. 2024-11-20T08:40:26Z 2024-11-20T08:40:26Z 2024-10-24 journal article Ruíz Alias, S.A. et. al. PLoS ONE 19(10): e0312348. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312348] https://hdl.handle.net/10481/97124 10.1371/journal.pone.0312348 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ open access Atribución 4.0 Internacional PLOS ONE