<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/97068">
      <dc:title>The influence of specific resistance training methodological prescription variables on strength development under hypoxic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Benavente Bardera, Cristina</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Feriche Fernández-Castanys, María Belén</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>altitude</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>performance</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>normobaric hypoxia</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>prescription variables</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted focused on the impact of specific methodological&#xd;
prescription variables in resistance training (RT) programming on muscle strength under hypoxic conditions.&#xd;
Searches of Pubmed-Medline, Web of Science, Sport Discuss and the Cochrane Library compared&#xd;
the effect of RT on strength development under hypoxic (RTH) vs. normoxic (RTN) conditions through the&#xd;
1-repetition maximum (1RM) test. Apart from the overall meta-analysis, several RT methodological&#xd;
prescription variables available in the included studies (set end point, total weekly training volume,&#xd;
type of exercise, region of the body measured or type of routine) were analysed. Thirteen studies met&#xd;
the inclusion criteria. The overall analyses showed trivial differences in 1RM favouring RTH over RTN&#xd;
(SMD = 0.18 [CI: 0.04; 0.31]; p = 0.030). Sub-analyses revealed that a RT programme of a non-full-body&#xd;
routine, including 9 or more sets per exercise/week of multi-joint exercises performed to non-failure,&#xd;
favoured RTH for enhancing 1RM (p &lt; 0.10). In conclusion, the evidence ratified a trivial benefit of RTH&#xd;
over RTN for muscle strength gains after a RT period. However, the handling of specific RT methodological&#xd;
prescription variables can slightly improve strength development outcomes in hypoxia.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T09:35:42Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T09:35:42Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2024-11</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Benavente, C., &amp; Feriche, B. (2024). The influence of specific resistance training methodological prescription variables on strength development under hypoxic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1–10.</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/97068</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1080/02640414.2024.2425536</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>embargoed access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Routledge; Taylor and Francis group</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>