<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/95152">
      <dc:title>Sensitivity of a standard Land Use Cover change cellular automata model to resample input Land Use Cover maps</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>García-Álvarez, David</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Camacho Olmedo, María Teresa</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Uncertainty</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Metronamica</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Majority rule</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Nearest neighbour</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Scale</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and the Feder European Regional Development Fund [INCERTIMAPS PGC2018-100770-B-100]; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Social Fund [Ayudas para contratos predoctorales para la formación de doctores 2014]; University of Granada [Contratos Puente 2018].</dc:description>
      <dc:description>Input data is one of the main sources of uncertainty in Land Use Cover Change&#xd;
(LUCC) modelling. Research has focused on the sensitivity of LUCC models to&#xd;
the spatial resolution of Land Use Cover (LUC) maps. However, little attention has&#xd;
been paid to the way that spatial resolution is changed. Both the spatial resolution&#xd;
and the resampling method change the modelled landscape composition and&#xd;
configuration. This may affect the way Cellular Automata LUCC models behave&#xd;
and, accordingly, the landscapes they simulate. This paper analyses the sensitivity&#xd;
of a standard LUCC model (Metronamica) to changes in the spatial resolution and&#xd;
resampling method of input LUC maps. Results prove how the model is more&#xd;
sensitive to changes in the spatial resolution than to variations of the resampling&#xd;
method. This last component has not much influence in the simulated landscape,&#xd;
although it alters the landscape composition.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2024-09-26T11:15:29Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2024-09-26T11:15:29Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Published version: García-Álvarez, D., &amp; Camacho Olmedo, M. T. (2021). Sensitivity of a standard Land Use Cover change cellular automata model to resample input Land Use Cover maps. South African Geographical Journal, 103(4), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2021.1872413</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/95152</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1080/03736245.2021.1872413</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>embargoed access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Taylor and Francis</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>