Concurrent validation of the resistance intensity scale for exercise for monitoring velocity-based training with elastic bands Colado, Juan C. Gene Morales, Javier Jiménez Martínez, Pablo Saez Berlanga, Ángel Ferri Caruana, Ana María García Ramos, Amador Flandez, Jorge Babiloni Lopez, Carlos Psychophysiological effort Perceived effort Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) The aim was to evaluate the concurrent validity and reliability of the Resistance Intensity Scale for Exercise [RISE], which uses verbal descriptors, to quantify the intensity in velocity-based training with elastic bands. Eighteen trained volunteers performed parallel squats at maximum speed at 40%, 55%, 70%, and 85%1RM in four sessions, two for familiarization and two for reliability. Each set was stopped at a 10% intra-set velocity loss. Participants reported the perceived effort (easy-low-moderate-hard-maximal) at the first and last repetition. The concurrent validation was conducted with external load (i.e., mean propulsive velocity, weight, repetitions, and maximum power) and internal load parameters (i.e., heart rate). Participants’ relative strength was calculated to assess its influence on the dependent variable. Acceptable concurrent validity and reliability (ICC>0.77, CV<21%) were observed, with the perceived effort being appropriate to differentiate between intensities and not being influenced by the participants’ relative strength (p = 0.88). A categorical linear regression showed significant (p < 0.001) associations between the RISE scores and the weight, repetitions, and mean propulsive velocity (r = 0.43–0.63). The findings certify the usefulness of the perceived exertion for quantifying the intensity during velocity-based training with elastic bands. The perceived exertion of the first and last repetition favors a proper dosage of the training load. 2024-07-17T09:14:50Z 2024-07-17T09:14:50Z 2024-03-21 journal article J.C. Colado et al. 10 (2024) e28298. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28298] https://hdl.handle.net/10481/93173 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28298 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ open access Atribución 4.0 Internacional Elsevier