Neurorehabilitation of Offenders, Consent and Consequentialist Ethics Lara Sánchez, Francisco Damián Consequentialism Consent Biorehabilitation Psychopathic offenders Moral enhancement The new biotechnology raises expectations for modifying human behaviour through its use. This article focuses on the ethical analysis of the not so remote possibility of rehabilitating criminals by means of neurotechnological techniques. The analysis is carried out from a synthetic position of, on the one hand, the consequentialist conception of what is right and, on the other hand, the emphasis on individual liberties. As a result, firstly, the ethical appropriateness of adopting a general predisposition for allowing the neurorehabilitation of prisoners only if it is safe and if they give their consent will be defended. But, at the same time, reasons will be given for requiring, in certain circumstances, the exceptional use of neurotechnology to rehabilitate severely psychopathic prisoners, even against their will, from the same ethical perspective. 2022-11-15T07:34:55Z 2022-11-15T07:34:55Z 2023 journal article Lara, F. Neurorehabilitation of Offenders, Consent and Consequentialist Ethics. Neuroethics 16, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09510-1 https://hdl.handle.net/10481/77968 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09510-1 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ open access Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional Neuroethics