Why Has the Socialism of Sumak Kawsay/Good Living Failed as a New Revolutionary School of Thought in Latin America? García García, Aurelio Sumak Kawsay Good living Twenty-first century socialism Ecuador Bolivia Buen vivir Socialismo del siglo XXI I wish to thank the research group Critizens (Economic History, Institutions and Development, sej-476) and the Applied Economics Department of the University of Granada its economic support. I also want to thank Katherine Burton for her writing and style advice. Sumak kawsay socialism, or good living socialism, is one of the three schools of political thought of sumak kawsay which first appeared in the first decade of the twenty-first century. The idea of good living is currently re-emerging in debates on how to build a new post-pandemic world. Sumak kawsay socialism, however, has remained on the sidelines of the political landscape and academic discussions. In its place, twenty-first century socialism has once again reappeared as the socialist proposal to create and organize a new system. This paper will analyze which practical and theoretical weaknesses and contradictions have led to the disappearance of good living socialism from political and intellectual debates. It concludes that intellectuals from different branches of socialism used sumak kawsay/good living as a “key symbol” to take advantage of the social, economic, political, and environmental situation in Ecuador and Bolivia in order to seize power. El socialismo sumak kawsay, o socialismo del buen vivir, es una de las tres corrientes políticas del buen vivir que aparecieron durante la primera década del siglo XXI. En la actualidad, el buen vivir está volviendo a emerger con fuerza en los debates sobre cómo construir un nuevo mundo pospandemia, pero el socialismo del sumak kawsay ha quedado al margen del panorama político y de las discusiones académicas. En su lugar, el socialismo del siglo XXI vuelve a ser la propuesta socialista para crear y organizar un nuevo sistema. En este trabajo se analizarán las debilidades y contradicciones teóricas y prácticas que han llevado al socialismo del buen vivir a desaparecer de todo debate político e intelectual, llegando a la conclusión de que intelectuales de diferentes ramas del socialismo aprovecharon la coyuntura social, económica, política y ambiental de Ecuador y Bolivia para tomar el “símbolo clave” del sumak kawsay/buen vivir y llegar al poder. 2022-06-01T07:13:48Z 2022-06-01T07:13:48Z 2022 info:eu-repo/semantics/article García-García, A. (2022). Why Has the Socialism of Sumak Kawsay/Good Living Failed as a New Revolutionary School of Thought in Latin America? Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 67(245), 299–329. [https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2022.245.77990] http://hdl.handle.net/10481/75154 10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2022.245.77990 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México