How are Natura 2000 protected areas covering different components of avian diversity in Spain? Morelli, Federico Ibáñez Álamo, Juan Diego Bird assemblages Community metrics Conservation planning Diversity metrics Protected areas network We are grateful to all ornithologists involved in fieldwork, data collection, and data entry. We would like to thank SEO/Birdlife for kindly allowing us to use their Spanish Atlas of Breeding Birds (Martí & del Moral 2003) and particularly J.C. del Moral, B. Molina, and V. Escandell for their help and patience. Finally, we thank anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their useful suggestions, which helped us improve the text’s final version. Protected areas are a relevant conservation tool at our disposal, especially for developing management strategies of natural habitats. However, explicit tests at large spatial scales about its effectivity protecting different components of biodiversity are still rare. This study explored the spatial matching between the distribution of three components of avian diversity (taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic metrics) and the network of Natura 2000 protected areas in Spain, the EU country with the most extensive terrestrial coverage. Overall, the spatial distribution of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity was slightly spatially congruent, matching with protected areas. However, each avian diversity metric showed differences in the arrangement of spatial clusters, also regarding the environment type. Species richness was higher in forests while it was lower in orchards, mixed environments, and arable lands. Functional dispersion was higher in forest and arable lands, while it was lower in wetlands. In contrast, the highest phylogenetic diversity was associated with wetlands and water bodies, with shrublands showing the lowest levels for this metric. All three avian diversity metrics were overall higher within than outside the Natura 2000 network. The species richness was higher in areas simultaneously protected by the Habitat and Birds Directives. Functional dispersion was higher in protected areas designed under the Birds Directive. Finally, the evolutionary uniqueness was well represented in all protected areas, although areas designed under Birds Directive showed the higher values for this metric. The presence of spatial mismatch among avian diversity components suggests the importance of considering taxonomic, functional, and evolutionary metrics simultaneously for a better spatial prioritisation in conservation planning. 2022-03-29T06:51:16Z 2022-03-29T06:51:16Z 2021-12-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Federico Morelli... [et al.]. How are Natura 2000 protected areas covering different components of avian diversity in Spain?, Ecological Indicators, Volume 133, 2021, 108452, ISSN 1470-160X, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108452] http://hdl.handle.net/10481/73855 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108452 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España Elsevier