An analysis of the centrality of intuition talk in the discussion on taste disagreements Bordonaba Plou, David Intuition talk Taste disagreements Linguistic corpora Intuition respecting This article has partly been elaborated in the framework of the project A Computational Dynamic Analysis of Public Debates on Politics, Aesthetics and Taste, No 3180096 of FONDECYT postdoctoral competition 2018, funded by CONICYT/FONDECYT/POSTDOCTORADO/No Proyecto 3180096. I am grateful to two anonymous referees for their invaluable comments, and to the audiences of the Seminario de Filosofia y Matematicas (Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile) and the GLiF Seminars (Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Spain), where I presented previous versions of this work. According to Cappelen (2012), analytic philosophers have traditionally used two arguments to defend the role of intuitions in philosophy. On the one hand, The Argument from Philosophical Practice claims that analytic philosophers rely on intuitions when defending their theories. On the other hand, The Argument from Intuition Talk contends that intuitions must play a prominent role in analytic philosophy because analytic philosophers use intuition talk profusely. Cappelen (2012) identifies three questions to be considered when assessing the Argument from Intuition Talk: a quantitative question, a centrality question, and an interpretative question. The available studies have mainly focused on the quantitative and interpretative questions. In this paper, I examine the centrality question, taking as a case study the literature on taste disagreements — a topic that has received significant attention in the philosophy of language in the last fifteen years. To this end, I first build a corpus with the most relevant works in the area and then examine the centrality of intuition talk. The results show that the use of intuition talk is central in the literature on taste disagreements, and that intuitions are taken as evidence in favor of a given theory if the theory can account for them. 2022-02-04T08:23:38Z 2022-02-04T08:23:38Z 2021-12-03 journal article Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2021). An Analysis of the Centrality of Intuition Talk in the Discussion on Taste Disagreements. Filozofia Nauki, 29(2), 133-156. [https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0008] http://hdl.handle.net/10481/72659 10.14394/filnau.2021.0008 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ open access Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España Warsaw University