<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/69339">
      <dc:title>Assembling a consensus on actinic cheilitis: A Delphi study</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Seoane, Juan</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>González Moles, Miguel Ángel</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Actinic cheilitis</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Consensus</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Delphi study</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Potentially malignant oral disorder</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Aims To discuss the terminology to define and classify actinic cheilitis (AC) and to build a consensus on the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to AC.&#xd;
&#xd;
Methods Two-round Delphi study using a questionnaire including 34 closed sentences (9 on terminology and taxonomy, 5 on potential for malignant transformation, 12 on diagnostic aspects, 8 on treatment) and 8 open questions. Experts' agreement was rated using a Likert scale (1-7).&#xd;
&#xd;
Results A consensus was reached on 24 out 34 statements (73.5%) and on 5 out of 8 (62.5%) close-ended questions. The response rate was identical in both rounds (attrition of 0%). AC is the term with the highest agreement (median of 7 (strongly agree; IQR: 6-7)) and the lowest dispersion (VC = 21.33). 'Potentially malignant disorder' was the preferred classification group for AC (median of 7) and 85.6% of participants showing some level of agreement (CV &lt; 50). Experts (66.75%) consider AC a clinical term (median: 7; IQR: 4-7) and believe definitive diagnosis can be made clinically (median: 6; IQR: 5-7), particularly by inspection and palpation (median: 5; IQR: 4-6). Histopathological confirmation is mandatory for the management of AC (median: 5; IQR: 2.5-7), even for homogeneous lesions (median: 5; IQR: 3.5-6). Consensus was reached on all treatment statements (VC &lt; 50).&#xd;
&#xd;
Conclusions AC is a potentially malignant disorder with a significant lack of agreement on diagnostic criteria, procedures, biopsy indications and the importance of techniques to assist in biopsy. A consensus was reached on nomenclature and management of this disorder.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2021-06-22T11:35:53Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021-06-22T11:35:53Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021-05-16</dc:date>
      <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Seoane J... [et al.]. Assembling a consensus on actinic cheilitis: A Delphi study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021;00:1–9. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.13200]</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10481/69339</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1111/jop.13200</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Atribución 3.0 España</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Wiley-Blackwell Publishing</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>