<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/67147">
      <dc:title>Chronic Effects of a Training Program Using a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Elite Cyclists</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>González Montesinos, José Luis</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Orantes González, Eva</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Heredia Jiménez, José María</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Respiratory muscle training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Cyclists</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>This study compared the response of a 9-week cycling training on ventilatory efficiency under two conditions: (i) Combined with respiratory muscle training (RMT) using a new nasal restriction device (FeelBreathe) (FB group) and (ii) without RMT (Control group). Eighteen healthy elite cyclists were randomly separated into the FB group (n = 10) or Control group (n = 8). Gas exchange was measured breath by breath to measure ventilatory efficiency during an incremental test on a cycloergometer before (Pre) and after (Post) the nine weeks of training. The FB group showed higher peak power (D (95%HDI) (0.82 W/kg (0.49, 1.17)), VO2max (5.27 mL/kg/min (0.69, 10.83)) and VT1 (29.3W(1.8, 56.7)) compared to Control at PostFINAL. The FB group showed lower values from Pre to PostPRE in minute ventilation (VE) (-21.0 L/min (-29.7, -11.5)), Breathing frequency (BF) (-5.1 breaths/min (-9.4, -0.9)), carbon dioxide output (VCO2) (-0.5 L/min (-0.7, -0.2)), respiratory equivalents for oxygen (EqO2) (-0.8 L/min (-2.4, 0.8)), heart rate (HR) (-5.9 beats/min (-9.2, -2.5)), respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (-0.1 (-0.1, -0.0) and a higher value in inspiratory time (Tin) (0.05 s (0.00, 0.10)), expiratory time (Tex) (0.11 s (0.05, 0.17)) and end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 (PETCO2) (0.3 mmHg (0.1, 0.6)). In conclusion, RMT using FB seems to be a new and easy alternative ergogenic tool which can be used at the same time as day-to-day training for performance enhancement.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2021-03-12T10:26:08Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021-03-12T10:26:08Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021-01-18</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Gonzalez-Montesinos, J.L.; Fernandez-Santos, J.R.; Vaz-Pardal, C.; Aragon-Martin, R.; Arnedillo-Muñoz, A.; Reina-Novo, J.; Orantes-Gonzalez, E.;Heredia-Jimenez, J.; Ponce-Gonzalez, J.G. Chronic Effects of a Training Program Using a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Elite Cyclists. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18020777</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10481/67147</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.3390/ijerph18020777</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Atribución 3.0 España</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Mdpi</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>