<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/60842">
      <dc:title>The paradoxical relationship between emotion regulation and gambling-related cognitive biases</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Ruiz de Lara, Cristian M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Navas, Juan F.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Perales López, José César</dc:creator>
      <dc:description>The funding agency is public and played no role in planning or executing this work, nor interfered with the collection and interpretation of data.</dc:description>
      <dc:description>Background&#xd;
Gambling behavior presents substantial individual variability regarding its severity, manifestations,&#xd;
and psychological correlates. Specifically, differences in emotion regulation, impulsivity,&#xd;
and cognitive distortions have been identified as crucial to describe individual profiles&#xd;
with implications for the prevention, prognosis, and treatment of gambling disorder (GD).&#xd;
Aims and method&#xd;
The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations of gambling-related cognitions&#xd;
(measured according to the GRCS model) with impulsivity (UPPS-P model) and emotion&#xd;
regulation (CERQ model), in a sample of 246 gamblers with different levels of gambling&#xd;
involvement, using mixed-effects modelling to isolate theoretically relevant associations&#xd;
while controlling for the potentially confounding effects of sociodemographic and clinical&#xd;
covariates.&#xd;
Results&#xd;
Affective/motivational dimensions of UPPS-P impulsivity positive urgency and sensation&#xd;
seeking, on the one hand, and CERQ emotion regulation strategies reappraisal, rumination&#xd;
and blaming others, on the other, independently and significantly predicted distorted gambling-&#xd;
related cognitions.&#xd;
Conclusions&#xd;
These results (a) reinforce the ones of previous studies stressing the relevance of emotional&#xd;
and motivational processes in the emergence of gambling-related cognitive distortions; and&#xd;
(b) replicate the seemingly paradoxical finding that gamblers use emotion regulation strategies&#xd;
customarily considered as adaptive (i.e. reappraisal) to strengthen and justify their&#xd;
biased beliefs about gambling outcomes and controllability.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2020-03-31T06:54:58Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2020-03-31T06:54:58Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2019-08-05</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Ruiz de Lara CM, Navas JF, Perales JC (2019) The paradoxical relationship between emotion regulation and gambling-related cognitive biases. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0220668. [https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220668]</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10481/60842</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0220668</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Atribución 3.0 España</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Public Library of Science</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>