How do women and men differ in research collaborations based on authorship positions? The Spanish case Morillo, Fernanda Escabias Machuca, Manuel Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida gender disparities authorship position research collaboration This study examines gender disparities in authorship and collaboration within the Spanish scientific workforce, focusing on international and industry co-authored publications. Drawing on a comprehensive dataset of over 165,000 publications and more than 170,000 identified authors a liated with Spanish institutions, the analysis explores how gender interacts with authorship position, research field, career stage, and team size. The results reveal a consistent under-representation of women in both types of collaboration, particularly in key authorship roles (first, last, and corresponding author). While women are more active at early career stages, their visibility in leadership roles tends to diminish over time, especially as the number of co-authors increases. Field-specific patterns show that even in highly feminized disciplines, such as Biomedical & Health Sciences, women are less likely to appear in prominent authorship positions. These findings raise important concerns about current research assessment practices that rely heavily on byline position as a proxy for contribution or leadership. The study contributes to ongoing discussions on responsible metrics and proposes policy recommendations to promote more equitable evaluation systems that reflect the collaborative and diverse nature of research careers. 2025-09-17T07:43:43Z 2025-09-17T07:43:43Z 2025-08-13 journal article Morillo F, Escabias M and Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z (2025) How do women and men dier in research collaborations based on authorship positions? The Spanish case. Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 10:1631931. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1631931 https://hdl.handle.net/10481/106364 10.3389/frma.2025.1631931 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ open access Atribución 4.0 Internacional Frontiers Research Foundation