Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMolina Pérez, Alberto 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T13:30:57Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T13:30:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.citationMolina-Pérez, Alberto & Ave, Anne & Bernat, James. (2020). Inconsistency between the circulatory and the brain death criteria of death in the Uniform Determination of Death Act. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17662.61764.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/99746
dc.description.abstractPresentation of a paper submitted to the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. We show a conceptual inconsistency in the Uniform Death Determination Act, the US model statute on death determination, regarding the use of the concept of "cessation of functions". We examine the possible origins of that inconsistency and we explore possible solutions to it. Our analysis applies to any country with both a circulatory criterion and a brain criterion for determining death.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleInconsistency between the circulatory and the brain death criteria of death in the Uniform Determination of Death Actes_ES
dc.typeconference outputes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.13140/RG.2.2.17662.61764.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PP]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License