Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMolina Pérez, Alberto 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T13:30:57Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T13:30:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.citationMolina-Pérez, Alberto & Ave, Anne & Bernat, James. (2020). Inconsistency between the circulatory and the brain death criteria of death in the Uniform Determination of Death Act. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17662.61764.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/99746
dc.description.abstractPresentation of a paper submitted to the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. We show a conceptual inconsistency in the Uniform Death Determination Act, the US model statute on death determination, regarding the use of the concept of "cessation of functions". We examine the possible origins of that inconsistency and we explore possible solutions to it. Our analysis applies to any country with both a circulatory criterion and a brain criterion for determining death.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleInconsistency between the circulatory and the brain death criteria of death in the Uniform Determination of Death Actes_ES
dc.typeconference outputes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.13140/RG.2.2.17662.61764.


Ficheros en el ítem

[PP]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License