Effect of a Novel Food Rich inMiraculin on the Intestinal Microbiome ofMalnourished Patients with Cancer and Dysgeusia
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Plaza Díaz, Julio Ramón; Brandimonte Hernández, Marco; López-Plaza, Bricia; Ruiz Ojeda, Francisco Javier; Álvarez Mercado, Ana Isabel; Arcos-Castellanos, Lucía; Feliú-Batlle, Jaime; Hummel, Thomas; Palma-Milla, Samara; Gil Hernández, ÁngelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
cancer neoplasms dysgeusia
Fecha
2025-01-05Referencia bibliográfica
Plaza Díaz, J.R. et. al. Nutrients 2025, 17, 246. [https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17020246]
Patrocinador
Medicinal Gardens S.L. through the Center for Industrial Technological Development (CDTI), “Cervera” Transfer R&D Projects. Ref. IDI-20210622. (Science and Education Ministry, Spain)Resumen
Background/Objectives: Dysgeusia contributes to malnutrition and worsens the
quality of life of patients with cancer. Despite the different strategies, there is no effective
treatment for patients suffering from taste disorders provided by the pharmaceutical
industry. Therefore, we developed a novel strategy for reducing side effects in cancer
patients by providing a novel food supplement with the taste-modifying glycoprotein
miraculin, which is approved by the European Union, as an adjuvant tomedical–nutritional
therapy. Methods: A pilot randomized, parallel, triple-blind, and placebo-controlled
intervention clinical trial was carried out in which 31 malnourished patients with cancer and
dysgeusia receiving antineoplastic treatment were randomized into three arms—standard
dose of dried miracle berries (DMBs) (150 mg DMB/tablet), high dose of DMBs (300 mg
DMB/tablet), or placebo (300 mg freeze-dried strawberry)—for three months. Patients
consumed a DMB or placebo tablet before each main meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner).
Using stool samples from patients with cancer, we analyzed the intestinal microbiome
via nanopore methodology. Results: We detected differences in the relative abundances
of genera Phocaeicola and Escherichia depending on the treatment. Nevertheless, only the
Solibaculum genus was more abundant in the standard-dose DMB group after 3 months. At
the species level, Bacteroides sp. PHL 2737 presented a relatively low abundance in both DMB groups, whereas Vescimonas coprocola presented a relatively high abundance in both
treatment groups after 3 months. Furthermore, a standard dose of DMB was positively
associated with TNF-α levels and Lachnoclostridium and Mediterraneibacter abundances,
and a high dose of DMB was negatively associated with TNF-α levels and the relative
abundance of Phocaeicola. Following the administration of a high dose of DMB, a positive
correlation was observed between erythrocyte polyunsaturated fatty acids and the presence
of Lachnoclostridium and Roseburia. Additionally, a positive association was identified
between Phocaeicola and the acetic acid concentration of feces. There was a negative
association between the relative abundance of Phocaeicola and taste perception in the highdose
DMB group. Conclusions: The combination of DMB intake with nutritional treatment
and individualized dietary guidance results in positive changes in the intestinal microbiome
of patients with cancer and dysgeusia. Changes observed in the intestinal microbiome
might contribute to maintaining an appropriate immune response in cancer patients. As
the current pilot study included a limited number of participants, further clinical trials on a
larger group of patients are needed to draw robust findings.