Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMijnendonckx, Kristel
dc.contributor.authorSmolders, Carla
dc.contributor.authorBartak, Deepa
dc.contributor.authorLe Duc, Trung
dc.contributor.authorMorales Hidalgo, Mar 
dc.contributor.authorPovedano-Priego, Cristina 
dc.contributor.authorJroundi, Fadwa 
dc.contributor.authorL. Merroun, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorLeys, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorCerna, Katerina
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T08:07:08Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T08:07:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-24
dc.identifier.citationMijnendonckx, K. et. al. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2024;16:e70047. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.70047]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/99173
dc.description.abstractApproaches to DNA extraction play a crucial role in determining the variability of results obtained through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Particularly, clay-rich samples can impede the efficiency of various standard cultivationindependent techniques. We conducted an inter-laboratory comparison study to thoroughly assess the efficacy of two published DNA extraction methods (kit-based and phenol-chloroform-based) specifically designed for bentonite samples. To this end, we spiked Wyoming MX 80 bentonite with two different mock communities and compared the obtained DNA yield and purity, the presence of contaminants and the community profile. Our findings suggest that both methods are equally viable, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of the downstream analysis. However, it is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen method, as comparing results becomes challenging, particularly in the presence of bentonite. In summary, our study emphasizes the significance of standardized DNA extraction methods and underscores the importance of validating these methods using appropriate controls when studying microbial communities with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, particularly in environments characterized by low biomass and clay-rich compositions. Additionally, slight modifications to one of the extraction methods can substantially enhance its efficiency.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (2014-2018) under grant agreement No. 847593es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSÚRAO (SO2020-017)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWiley Online Libraryes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleComparing the effectiveness of different DNA extraction methods in MX-80 bentonitees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/H2020/FP7/847593es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1758-2229.70047
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional