Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrápolli Sanz, María José 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T07:47:25Z
dc.date.available2025-01-14T07:47:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophical Topics 50 (1): 83-107es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/99038
dc.description.abstractThe background of this paper is what I call “pragmatic inferentialism,” a view that I attribute to Robert Brandom. Here, I develop Brandom’s view and argue (i) that it is a kind of subject naturalism, in Price’s sense, and (ii) that the charge of idealism sometimes addressed against it is unwarranted. Regarding (i), I show that pragmatic inferentialism finds support from evolutionary psychology and developmental psychology. Regarding (ii), I present what I call “level 0 expressivism,” which I take to be the semantic counterpart of some aspects of evolutionary psychology and developmental psychology. Besides, I resort to Brandom’s defense of Hegel’s conceptual realism. The conclusion of the paper is a vindication of objective truth in the inferentialist framework.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.titleTracking the world down. How inferentialism accounts for objective truthes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.5840/philtopics20225015
dc.type.hasVersionAOes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record