Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorSáez- Ventura, Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorLópez Montoya, Antonio Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorLuna, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorRomero- Vidal, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorPalma, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorTella, José L.
dc.contributor.authorCarrete, Martina
dc.contributor.authorLiébanas, Gracia M.
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Jesús M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T06:53:19Z
dc.date.available2025-01-14T06:53:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationSáez-Ventura, Á., López-Montoya, A. J., Luna, Á., Romero-Vidal, P., Palma, A., Tella, J. L., ... & Pérez, J. M. (2022). Drivers of the Ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns in rural and urban burrowing owls. Biology, 11(8), 1141.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/99010
dc.description.abstractUrbanization creates new ecological conditions that can affect biodiversity at all levels, including the diversity and prevalence of parasites of species that may occupy these environments. However, few studies have compared bird–ectoparasite interactions between urban and rural individuals. Here, we analyze the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns of urban and rural burrowing owls, Athene cunicularia, to assess the influence of host traits (i.e., sex, age, and weight), and environmental factors (i.e., number of conspecifics per nest, habitat type and aridity) on its composition. Ectoparasites of burrowing owls included two lice, one flea, and one mite. The overall prevalence for mites, lice and fleas was 1.75%, 8.76% and 3.50%, respectively. A clear pattern of co-infection was detected between mites and fleas and, to less extent, between mites and lice. Adult owls harbored fewer ectoparasites than nestlings, and adult females harbored more lice than males. Our results also show that mite and flea numbers were higher when more conspecifics cohabited the same burrow, while lice showed the opposite pattern. Rural individuals showed higher flea parasitism and lower mite parasitism than urban birds. Moreover, mite numbers were negatively correlated with aridity and host weight. Although the ectoparasitic load of burrowing owls appears to be influenced by individual age, sex, number of conspecifics per nest, and habitat characteristics, the pattern of co-infection found among ectoparasites could also be mediated by unexplored factors such as host immune response, which deserves further research.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa de la Universidad de Jaénes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAthene cuniculariaes_ES
dc.subjectCo-infectiones_ES
dc.subjectEctoparasiteses_ES
dc.subjectFleases_ES
dc.subjectLicees_ES
dc.subjectMiteses_ES
dc.subjectUrban ecologyes_ES
dc.titleDrivers of the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns in rural and urban burrowing owlses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081141


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional