Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Ecija, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorVargas Quesada, Benjamín 
dc.contributor.authorChinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-17T09:20:15Z
dc.date.available2024-12-17T09:20:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/98107
dc.description.abstractProper field delineation plays an important role in scientometric studies, although it is a tough task. Based on an emerging and interdisciplinary field —nanoscience and nanotechnology— this paper highlights the problem of field delineation. First we review the related literature. Then, three different approaches to delineate a field of knowledge were applied at three different levels of aggregation: subject category, publication level, and journal level. Expert opinion interviews served to assess the data, and precision and recall of each approach were calculated for comparison. Our findings confirm that field delineation is a complicated issue at both the quantitative and the qualitative level, even when experts validate resultses_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectbibliometricses_ES
dc.subjectScience clasificationes_ES
dc.subjectResearch topices_ES
dc.subjectField delineationes_ES
dc.subjectScientometricses_ES
dc.titleCoping with the delineation of emerging fields: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology as a case studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joi.2019.100976
dc.type.hasVersionAOes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional