Evaluation of the Vaginal Panel Realtime PCR kit (Vircell, SL) for diagnosing vaginitis: A comparative study with routinely used diagnostics
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Amor, Isabel; Alberola, Ana; De Salazar, Adolfo; Viñuela, Laura; Úbeda Portugués, Sara; Galán, María Isabel; Mendoza, Pablo; García García, FedericoEditorial
PLOS ONE
Fecha
2024-11-06Referencia bibliográfica
Amor, I. et. al. PLoS ONE 19(11): e0313414. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313414]
Patrocinador
Vircell S.L. AdS; Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant number JR22/00055)Resumen
Vaginitis is a prevalent clinical disorder associated with several adverse health consequences,
prompting women to seek medical care. In this study we evaluate the Vaginal
Panel Real-Time PCR kit (qPCR test) against routinely used diagnostics for detection of
bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis. A total of
1011 vaginal swab specimens were analyzed. The routinely diagnostic methods for BV was
Gram stain-based Nugent score. VVC presence was detected by culture, and Candida species
were identified using MALDI-TOF MS. Trichomonas vaginalis was identified by culture
in a selective medium. Molecular analyses were conducted on the MagXtract® 3200 System
and analyzed using the CFX96™ Real-Time PCR Detection System. The sensitivity, specificity,
positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the qPCR test compared to
the reference method for BV diagnosis was 93.1%, 88.8%, 90.1% and 92.2%, respectively,
with a Kappa value of 0.82. For Candida species, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive
value, and negative predictive value were 96.0%, 98.4%, 95.3%, and 98.7%, respectively.
The qPCR test detected 32 additional positive samples for Candida not reported by the routinely
used diagnostics. For trichomoniasis, the qPCR test identified T. vaginalis in fifteen
specimens, despite no microscopic detection in cultured specimens. Our results demonstrate
that the Vaginal Panel Real-Time PCR kit shows optimal concordance with routinely
used diagnostics for diagnosing vaginitis. Furthermore, enhancing detection of T. vaginalis.
However, further validation studies are necessary to confirm its full diagnostic accuracy.
The use of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) provides rapid and accurate diagnosis,
crucial for early detection and treatment of vaginitis.