The Effect of Concurrent Resistance Training on Tethered Force, Lower Limbs Strength, Anaerobic Critical Velocity, and Swimming Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Liu, Xitong; Matjiur, Radomyos; Sonchan, Wirat; Charoenwattana, Sukanya; Chainok, Phornpot; Gay Párraga, Ana; Makaje, Niromlee; Zacca, RodrigoEditorial
MDPI
Materia
exercise physiology physical fitness training process
Fecha
2024-12-05Referencia bibliográfica
Liu, X. et. al. Physiologia 2024, 4, 454–464. [https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia4040031]
Patrocinador
Research Center in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto (FADEUP); Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR); both are funded by the Fundação Para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT; grants UIDB/00617/2020 https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00617/2020; UIDP/00617/2020 https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00617/2020 and LA/P/0064/2020, respectively)Resumen
Background: Combining pool-based and resistance workouts, both in the pool and on
dry land, is a valuable approach to enhancing swimming performance. However, few investigations
have been conducted on this topic. Through a randomized controlled trial study, we investigated the
effects of a 10-week concurrent resistance training program, which integrated resistance workouts
both in the pool and on dry land on tethered force, lower limbs strength, anaerobic critical velocity,
and swimming performance, in regional age-group breaststroke swimmers. Methods: Regional agegroup
swimmers (N = 24, males) were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group
(EG: 15.1 ± 0.5 years old) performed combined pool-based + resistance workouts, both in the pool
and on dry land. The control group (CG: 15.1 ± 0.7 years old) performed their usual training regime,
i.e., pool-based + resistance workouts on dry land only. The tethered swimming force, muscular
strength, anaerobic critical velocity, and swimming performance and technique of the swimmers
were evaluated before the training program began and after 10 weeks. Results: Improvements were
observed in the EG vs. the CG in terms of the mean force (30.04%, p = 0.02; d = 0.75), one-repetition
maximum back squat (20.57%, p = 0.01; d = 2.05), maximal force (19.23%, p = 0.03; d = 0.69), and
anaerobic critical velocity (4.2%, p = 0.04; d = 0.61). The 50 and 200 m breaststroke performance times
improved (4.3 and 5.4%, p = 0.01, d = 0.88–0.92, respectively) after 10 weeks. Conclusions: With the
increasing demands of contemporary swimming competitions, which often include heats, semifinals,
and finals, achieving optimal physical fitness to compete at an elite level, in every round, is vital for
swimmers. The combination of resistance training workouts both in the pool and on dry land seems
to enhance swimming performance in age-group swimmers, particularly in sprint to middle-distance
breaststroke swimmers.