Why, how and with whom? The impact of perceived ally motives on migrants’ support for collective actions
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Forced migration Collective action Allies
Fecha
2023-10-06Referencia bibliográfica
Urbiola Vega, A. & Carmona López, C. & Lemus Martín, S. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 5 (2023) 100157. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100157]
Patrocinador
Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Government of Spain by Grant no. PID2019-111549GB-I00, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033/; FEDER/Junta de Andalucía-Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades, Grant/Award Number: A-SEJ-72-UGR20; Universidad de Granada/CBUA.Resumen
Social inequalities between migrants and the host society trigger collective actions that aim to reduce such inequalities.
Such actions can be led by migrants themselves, or by advantaged members from the host society who
act as allies. In three studies conducted in Spain (N Study 1 = 182 low vulnerability migrants; N Study 2 = 160
forced migrants and refugees; N Study 3 = 418 migrants with different levels of vulnerability) we evaluated: How
perceived ally motives (egalitarian, paternalistic and performative) impact three different types of migrants’
collective action tendencies: pro-alliance (e.g., meetings between migrants and Spaniards), led by Spaniards (e.
g., pro-migrant demonstrations organized by Spaniards), and/or led by migrants (e.g., creation of political associations
led by migrants). Additionally, we evaluated what type of alliance (as one-group recategorization or
coalition) migrants prefer to build with members of the advantaged group. We also analyzed how perceived
motives to support migrants relate to the evaluation for the types of alliance (Studies 2 and 3), and whether the
level of vulnerability of the participants moderates the role of perceived paternalistic motives on collective action
tendencies (Study 3). The results confirm that perceived ally egalitarian motives predict higher migrant support
for pro-alliance collective action, as well as those led by Spanish allies across studies. Perceived paternalistic
motives have a greater impact on highly socioeconomically vulnerable migrant support for collective action
tendencies than on less vulnerable ones. There is no clear pattern of preference about perceiving themselves as
part of a singular group (one-group recategorization) or in a coalition with advantaged group members who
share the goal to promote migrants’ rights. However, perceived egalitarian motives are positively related to the
value attached to one-group recategorization. This research contributes to understanding the factors involved in
participation to achieve social change amongst refugees or asylum seekers as well as less vulnerable migrants.