Identification and Visualization of the Intellectual Structure in Graphene Research
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Frontiers Media
Materia
graphene information visualization bibliometric analysis
Fecha
2017-10-25Referencia bibliográfica
Vargas Quesada, B. & Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z. & Rodríguez, N. Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 2:7. [https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00007]
Patrocinador
Projects I + D + I, State Program of Research, Development, and Innovation oriented to the Challenges of the Society: NANOMETRICS (Ref. CSO2014-57770-R) Supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of SpainResumen
Since the discovery of the promising properties of graphene, research in the field has
attracted numerous grants and sponsors, leading to an exponential rise in the number of
papers and applications. This article presents a global map of graphene research and its
intellectual structure, drawn using the terms of more than 50,000 documents extracted
from Scopus database, years 1998–2015. The unit of analysis consisted of descriptors
(including Author Keywords and Indexed Keywords), with the co-occurrence of descriptor
as the unit of measure, using fractional counting. The main research lines identified
are: Fundamental Research, Functionalization and Biomedical Applications, Technology
and Devices, Materials Science, Energy Storage, Optics and Chemical Properties and
Sensors. Using overlay maps, we depict the graphene research efforts of the United
States, the European Union (Europe-28), and China, and project their evolution through
longitudinal maps to facilitate comparison. The United States was initially at the head of
world output in graphene research, but was surpassed by China in 2011 and by Europe
in 2014, as a result of their respective scientific policies and financial support. The output
of China has since been so intense that it can be said to mark graphene research trends.
We believe this information may be valuable for the core community involved in this
scientific field, as it offers a large-scale analysis showing how research has changed over
time. It is therefore also helpful for policy makers and research planners. The resulting
maps are a useful and attractive tool for the graphene research community, as they
reveal the main lines of exploration at a glance. The methodology described here could
be re-created in any other field of science to uncover and display its intellectual structure
and evolution over time.