Self-Regulation of SMR Power Led to an Enhancement of Functional Connectivity of Somatomotor Cortices in Fibromyalgia Patients
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Frontiers Media
Materia
fibromyalgia neurofeedback sensorimotor rhythm
Fecha
2020-03-19Referencia bibliográfica
Terrasa, J.L. et. al. Front. Neurosci. 14:236. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00236]
Patrocinador
Grants from PSI2017-88388-C4- 1-R (AEI/FEDER, UE), PSI2017-88388-C4-3-R (AEI/FEDER, UE); Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (ref: PSI2013-48260-C3-1-R and PSI2014- 57231-R)Resumen
Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that altered activity in somatosensory and
motor cortices play a key role in pain chronification. Neurofeedback training of
sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) is a tool which allow individuals to self-modulate their brain
activity and to produce significant changes over somatomotor brain areas. Several
studies have further shown that neurofeedback training may reduce pain and other
pain-related symptoms in chronic pain patients. The goal of the present study was to
analyze changes in SMR power and brain functional connectivity of the somatosensory
and motor cortices elicited by neurofeedback task designed to both synchronize and
desynchronize the SMR power over motor and somatosensory areas in fibromyalgia
patients. Seventeen patients were randomly assigned to the SMR training (n = 9) or
to a sham protocol (n = 8). All participants were trained during 6 sessions, and fMRI
and EEG power elicited by synchronization and desynchronization trials were analyzed.
In the SMR training group, four patients achieved the objective of SMR modulation in
more than 70% of the trials from the second training session (good responders), while
five patients performed the task at the chance level (bad responders). Good responders
to the neurofeedback training significantly reduced pain and increased both SMR power
modulation and functional connectivity of motor and somatosensory related areas during
the last neurofeedback training session, whereas no changes in brain activity or pain
were observed in bad responders or participants in the sham group. In addition, we
observed that good responders were characterized by reduced impact of fibromyalgia
and pain symptoms, as well as by increased levels of health-related quality of life during
the pre-training sessions. In summary, the present study revealed that neurofeedback
training of SMR elicited significant brain changes in somatomotor areas leading to a
significant reduction of pain in fibromyalgia patients. In this sense, our research provide
evidence that neurofeedback training is a promising tool for a better understanding of
brain mechanisms involved in pain chronification.





