Active methodologies and curricular sustainability in teacher training
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Emerald
Materia
Sustainable development Active methodologies Teacher training
Fecha
2023-02-20Referencia bibliográfica
Martínez Valdivia, E., Pegalajar Palomino, M. d. C., & Burgos-Garcia, A. (2023). Active methodologies and curricular sustainability in teacher training [Review of Active methodologies and curricular sustainability in teacher training]. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(6), 1364-1380. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2022-0168
Patrocinador
University of Jaén/CBUAResumen
Purpose – Changes in society, the economy and health require a response from higher education regarding
the training of professionals, specifically, future teachers. In this sense, active methodologies constitute, in line with the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development, a key strategic element in teacher training, given the need to educate for sustainability and social responsibility (SR). This study aims to examine innovative teachinglearning experiences based on the use of active methodologies and the interaction with sustainability and SR on the part of university students in Education.
Design/methodology/approach – The methodology constitutes a systematic review of the qualitative,
inductive and exploratory literature, on the basis of the PRISMA declaration principles. The sample is
composed of research published between 2011 and 2021 in the world’s most important scientific databases in the educational context (WoS, Scopus and Eric-ProQuest).
Findings – This study reveals the methodologies that are most commonly used in ecological literacy, their
implications for the acquisition of competencies in terms of curriculum sustainability and their relationship
with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and SR. Higher education must reflect and demonstrate
awareness of its social mission and pedagogical effectiveness, to transform education, taking as a reference
the sustainability and SR in the university student’s curriculum.
Research limitations/implications – One of the main limitations of this study is the scarcity of
research studies that include, jointly, the key descriptors analysed in this contribution such as teacher
training, active methodologies, sustainability and SR. Another limitation to observe in this work is related to
having considered as inclusion criteria solely research published in open access journals, since other research published in closed access journals is omitted.
Originality/value – This work demonstrates the usefulness of active methodologies in the training and
professional development of future Education students in “sustainability”.