Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROs) as tools for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in women with gynecologic and breast cancers: a systematic review
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Boutib, Amal; Azizi, Asmaa; Youlyouz-Marfak, Ibtissam; Kouiti, Malak; Taiebine, Mohamed; Benfatah, Mohamed; Nejjari, Chakib; Bounou, Salim; Marfak, AbdelghafourEditorial
Sage Journals
Materia
ePROs patient-reported outcomes HRQoL
Date
2024-11-10Referencia bibliográfica
Boutib, A. et. al. DIGITAL HEALTH Volume 10: 1–15. [https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241297041]
Abstract
Objectives: To provide a comprehensive review of the use of electronic patient-reported outcomes measures (ePROs) as digital
health tools to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in women with breast, ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancers.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that used ePROs to evaluate HRQoL in women diagnosed
with breast and gynecological cancers. The review followed the 2020 update of the PRISMA guidelines and a pre-registered
protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024516737). Inclusion criteria encompassed studies focusing on ePROs for HRQoL assessment
in the specified cancers, without language restrictions, and published between January 2000 and December 2023. Studies
were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and
full texts to identify eligible studies.
Results: The search yielded 4978 articles. After removing duplicates, 900 articles were assessed for eligibility by screening the
titles and abstracts. After screening the full text of 168 articles, a total of 16 studies were included in this systematic review. These
studies were mainly conducted in Europe and the Americas and included different study designs such as randomized controlled
trials (four articles), prospective studies (seven articles), and feasibility and validation studies (five articles). The majority of the
studies focused on breast cancer (87.5%), with fewer studies addressing ovarian and cervical cancers. A variety of ePRO tools
were used, including the FACT and EORTC QLQ. Findings show that ePROs enhance therapeutic management, treatment adherence,
and HRQoL through improved symptom monitoring and communication between patients and providers.
Conclusion: The integration of ePROs in oncology care facilitates a patient-centered approach, enhances communication
between patients and healthcare providers, and supports personalized treatment strategies. These findings underscore
the importance of incorporating ePROs into routine cancer care to improve overall patient outcomes and HRQoL.