No place for Pliocene tourists with Ockham’s razor in the pocket: Comment on Crespo et al. (2023)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Afrosoricida Eulipotyphla Pliocene
Fecha
2024-11-05Referencia bibliográfica
Furió, M. & Minwer Barakat, R. & García Alix Daroca, A. Palaeoworld 33 (2024) 1727–1734. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2024.02.002]
Patrocinador
Project P20_00066 (financed by the Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación, Junta de Andalucía/FEDER); Projects PID2020- 117289GB-I00 and PID2020-116908GB-I00, funded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/50 1100011033/); Research groups RNM190 (Junta de Andalucı´a); ‘‘PALEOSTRAT: paleontological and stratigraphic record from Cretaceous and Cenozoic” (Grup de Recerca 2021 SGR 00127, Generalitat de Catalunya)Resumen
Crespo et al. (2023) have recently described a new genus and species called Europotamogale melkarti, purportedly an afrosoricid ‘tourist
genus’ coming from central Africa to Spain during the Pliocene. The occurrence of this mysterious animal has been justified by means
of a migration of thousands of kilometers leaving no other fossil evidence all along such an incredible journey. According to our analyses,
this ‘tourist genus’ is surrounded by many inconsistent facts, which lead us to the conclusion that Europotamogale should not have been
erected as a new taxon because its holotype (and only element yet known) belongs to a very different animal. We alternatively propose
that this fossil is indeed a fragment of a tooth of a water-mole of the genus Archaeodesmana, which is a much more parsimonious
hypothesis.