Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorRamia, José M.
dc.contributor.authorSerradilla Martín, Mario
dc.contributor.authorVillodre, Celia
dc.contributor.authorRubio, Juan J.
dc.contributor.authorRotellar, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorK. Siriwardena, Ajith
dc.contributor.authorWakabayashi, Go
dc.contributor.authorCatena, Fausto
dc.contributor.authorPERCHODEL Collaborative Study Group
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T11:09:16Z
dc.date.available2024-11-18T11:09:16Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-12
dc.identifier.citationRamia, J.M. & Serradilla Martín, M. & PERCHODEL Collaboration. et. al. World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:32. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00561-8]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/97001
dc.description.abstractBackground There has been a progressive increase in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in acute cholecystitis (AC) over the last decades due to population aging, and the support of guidelines (Tokyo Guidelines (TG), World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Guidelines) as a valid therapeutical option. However, there are many unanswered questions about the management of PCs. An international consensus on indications and PC management using Delphi methodology with contributions from experts from three surgical societies (EAHPBA, ANS, WSES) have been performed. Methods A two-round Delphi consensus, which included 27 questions, was sent to key opinion leaders in AC. Participants were asked to indicate their ‘agreement/disagreement’ using a 5-point Likert scale. Survey items with less than 70% consensus were excluded from the second round. For inclusion in the final recommendations, each survey item had to have reached a group consensus (≥ 70% agreement) by the end of the two survey rounds. Results 54 completed both rounds (82% of invitees). Six questions got > 70% and are included in consensus recommendations: In patients with acute cholecystitis, when there is a clear indication of PC, it is not necessary to wait 48 h to be carried out; Surgery is the first therapeutic option for the TG grade II acute cholecystitis in a patient suitable for surgery; Before PC removal a cholangiography should be done; There is no indication for PC in Tokyo Guidelines (TG) grade I patients; Transhepatic approach is the route of choice for PC; and after PC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred approach (93.1%). Conclusions Only six statements about PC management after AC got an international consensus. An international guideline about the management of PCs are necessary.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAcute choleces_ES
dc.subjectPercutaneous cholecystectomyes_ES
dc.subjectDelphies_ES
dc.subjectConsensuses_ES
dc.subjectOutcomeses_ES
dc.titleInternational Delphi consensus on the management of percutaneous choleystostomy in acute cholecystitis (E‑AHPBA, ANS, WSES societies)es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13017-024-00561-8
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional