Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRubio de Casas, Rafael Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Brull, Irene
dc.contributor.authorMilla, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorOcaña Calahorro, Francisco Javier 
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T08:59:07Z
dc.date.available2024-11-18T08:59:07Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-18
dc.identifier.citationRubio de Casas, R. et. al. Plants People Planet. 2024;1–11. [https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10596]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/96981
dc.description.abstractIn spite of a large history of research, it is still unclear which functional traits may have mediated plant domestication. Solving this problem requires consideration of the ecological and demographic disparities between natural plant populations and cultivated fields. Since population density tends to be higher in the latter, we hypothesized that traits facilitating growth and survival in dense, monospecific populations might have been relevant for initial domestication. We investigated whether functional traits that respond to population density varied across three different domestication stages: undomesticated crop wild relatives, natural populations of crop progenitors, and landraces. To do this, we compared traits influencing competition (lodging; growth rate), resource acquisition (plant height; total aerial and root biomass) and yield (fruit number) in three annual legume crops—lentil, grasspea, and vetch—grown without resource limitation at three different densities. Our results showed clear differences among species, likely reflective of the distinct uses of the crops and their domestication pathways. Nevertheless, undomesticated relatives consistently differed from crop progenitors and landraces, producing smaller, slower-growing plants that were more prostrate and allocated less biomass to roots. The effect of selection under domestication on these vegetative traits appeared to be largely negligible. Conversely, landraces produced more fruits. We conclude that early agriculturalists selected for domestication wild legumes that performed well in dense monocultures and were more effective in resource capture. Later domestication and breeding efforts likely had more significant effects on reproductive traits, such as fruit and seed production.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grant no. CGL2016-79950-R)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Granada / CBUAes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWiley Online Libraryes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectartificial selectiones_ES
dc.subjectcrop ecologyes_ES
dc.subjectcrop evolutiones_ES
dc.subjectFabaceaees_ES
dc.titleSelection for domestication favored taxa characterized by fast growth and tolerance of high intraspecific densityes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ppp3.10596
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional