A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Acceptability, Implementation, Equity
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Toledo‐Chavarri, Ana; Delgado Rodríguez, Janet; Padilla-Ruiz, María del Carmen; Rodríguez‐Martín, BeatrizEditorial
Wiley Online Library
Materia
acceptability adults with type 1 diabetes implementation insulin pump
Fecha
2024-10-20Referencia bibliográfica
Toledo Chavarri, A. et. al. Nursing & Health Sciences, 2024; 26:e13177. [https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13177]
Patrocinador
CPG on Diabetes Mellitus Type 1, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Health and coordinated by the Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service; Spanish Ministry of Health in the framework of activities developed by the Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment for the National Health Service (RedETS)Resumen
This work provides a synthesis of the perceptions of people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and healthcare professionals
about the acceptability, implementation, and equity of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). A qualitative evidence
synthesis was carried out. Three online databases (Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched. Qualitative articles
which were available in Spanish or English were included. A descriptive thematic synthesis was conducted according to PRISMA
and ENTREQ guidelines. Thirty-two
references met the inclusion criteria of the study and were included out of an initial 345
identified references. Seven main themes were identified: (a) acceptability, (b) adaptation to the insulin pump, (c) facilitators
for the adequate use of insulin pump, (d) variability of acceptability, (e) barriers for the use of insulin pump, (f) feasibility and
implementation considerations, and (g) equity. CSII is well accepted by most people with T1DM, with some exceptions. CSII can
relieve management burden, increase autonomy and flexibility and improve family relationships. There were multiple perceived
barriers to its continued use. Future studies should continue to analyze inequalities in access and use of the CSII.