Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Manzaneda Salcedo, María Inmaculada 
dc.contributor.authorCastaño Hidalgo, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorVicente Álvarez De Manzaneda, María Inmaculada De 
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T12:34:50Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T12:34:50Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-24
dc.identifier.citationÁlvarez-Manzaneda, I.; Castaño-Hidalgo, Á.; de Vicente, I. Selecting the Most Sustainable Phosphorus Adsorbent for Lake Restoration: Effects on the Photosynthetic Activity of Chlorella sp. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8305. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198305es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/96753
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by PID2021-122429OB-I00 project, TED2021-129384B-C21 and TED2021-129384B-C22 projects funded MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and European Union NextGeneration EU/PRTR. This work was also supported by the European Commission (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019, Grant no. 897535).es_ES
dc.description.abstractTo promote the conservation of aquatic ecosystems, it is essential to delve into restoration techniques for selecting the most sustainable option for combating eutrophication. Hence, we study the effects of novel phosphorus (P) adsorbents (magnetic carbonyl iron particles, HQ, and two non-magnetic P adsorbents: CFH-12® and Phoslock®) on the growth and photosynthetic activity of Chlorella sp. More specifically, the intrinsic photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) and the nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) were measured in Chlorella sp. after different contact times with different concentrations of these adsorbents. Our initial hypothesis was that non-magnetic P adsorbents have more effects on the organisms than magnetic ones. However, our results did not show strong evidence of inhibitory effects caused by HQ nor CFH-12® (no significant effect size on ΦPSII), while Phoslock® showed inhibitory effects on the photosynthetic activity of Chlorella sp. for any of its concentrations (NPQ = 0). Lastly, we compared the effect of the studied P adsorbents in a real application scenery (Honda wetland, Spain). For this study case, it is likely that CFH-12® and HQ doses would not cause any negative effects on photosynthetic efficiency while Phoslock®, by limiting light availability, will drastically reduce it.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2021-122429OB-I00, TED2021-129384B-C21, TED2021-129384B-C22es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union NextGeneration EU/PRTRes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019, Grant no. 897535)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.titleSelecting the Most Sustainable Phosphorus Adsorbent for Lake Restoration: Effects on the Photosynthetic Activity of Chlorella sp.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/897535es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su16198305
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License