Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorales Artacho, Antonio Jesús
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Ramos, Amador 
dc.contributor.authorPérez Castilla, Alejandro 
dc.contributor.authorPadial Puche, Paulino 
dc.contributor.authorGómez García, Ángel Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorPeinado Herreros, Antonio Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorPérez Córdoba, José Luis 
dc.contributor.authorFeriche Fernández-Castanys, María Belén 
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-04T07:55:29Z
dc.date.available2024-11-04T07:55:29Z
dc.date.issued2019-07
dc.identifier.citationPublished version: Morales Artacho, Antonio J. et al. Muscle activation during power-oriented resistance training: continuous vs. cluster set configurations. J Strength Cond Res 33(7S): S95–S102, 2019. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002811es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/96571
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education under Grant [FPU 13/04801]; Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under Grant (DEP2015-64350-P- MINECO/FEDER).es_ES
dc.descriptionThis study is part of a PhD Thesis conducted in the Biomedicine Doctoral Studies of the University of Granada, Spain.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThis study examined performance and electromyography (EMG) changes during a power training protocol comprising continuous or clustered set configurations. Eighteen active males completed 6 sets of 6 repetitions during the loaded (20% 1 repetition maximum) countermovement jump (CMJ) exercise, continuously (n = 9) or with a 30-second pause every 2 repetitions (cluster; n = 9). Power output, vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and rectus femoris (RF) EMG were recorded during all CMJs. Relative changes from the first repetition were assessed on the EMG root mean square (RMS), median frequency (Fmed), and a low- to high-frequency ratio index of fatigue (FInsmk). Greater power output decrements were observed during the continuous set configuration (p = 0.001, h2 G , 0.01). Greater RMS increments in VL (6.8 6 11.3 vs. 21.7 6 5.8%) and RF (9.3 6 14.2 vs. 1.9 6 6.9%), but not VM (2.0 6 4.7 vs. 2.6 6 7.3%), were also observed in the continuous compared with the cluster sets (p = 0.033, h2 G = 0.06). Progressive decrements in Fmed and increments in FInsmk were observed across repetitions in both set configurations. In conclusion, although clustering sets between repetitions clearly maintained power output, mixed responses were observed on the examined EMG parameters.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under Grant (DEP2015-64350-P-MINECO/FEDER).es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipDeparamento de Educación Física y Deportivaes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGrupo de Investigación SEJ-438. Análisis y Control del Rendimiento Deportivoes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherLippincottes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcountermovement jumpes_ES
dc.subjectpower traininges_ES
dc.subjectresistance traininges_ES
dc.subjectmuscle fatiguees_ES
dc.titleMuscle activation during power-oriented resistance training: Continuous vs. cluster set configurationses_ES
dc.title.alternativeMuscle activation during cluster setses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000002811
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional