A Review of Symbolic, Subsymbolic and Hybrid Methods for Sequential Decision Making
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Association for Computing Machinery
Fecha
2024-06-28Referencia bibliográfica
Núñez Molina, C. & Mesejo Santiago, P. & Fernández Olivares, J. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 11, Article 272, 36 pages. [https://doi.org/10.1145/3663366]
Patrocinador
Grant PID2022-142976OB-I00, funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033; “ERDF A way of making Europe”; Andalusian Regional predoctoral grant no. 21-111-PREDOC-0039 and by “ESF Investing in your future”; Project CONFIA (grant PID2021-122916NB-I00), funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/5011000 11033/ and by ERDF/EUResumen
In the field of Sequential Decision Making (SDM), two paradigms have historically vied for supremacy: Automated Planning (AP) and Reinforcement Learning (RL). In the spirit of reconciliation, this article reviews AP, RL and hybrid methods (e.g., novel learn to plan techniques) for solving Sequential Decision Processes (SDPs), focusing on their knowledge representation: symbolic, subsymbolic, or a combination. Additionally, it also covers methods for learning the SDP structure. Finally, we compare the advantages and drawbacks of the existing methods and conclude that neurosymbolic AI poses a promising approach for SDM, since it combines AP and RL with a hybrid knowledge representation.