Evaluating tourist profiles and nature-based experiences in Biosphere Reserves using Flickr: Matches and mismatches between online social surveys and photo content analysis
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Moreno Llorca, Ricardo Antonio; Méndez, Pablo F.; Ros Candeira, Andrea; Alcaraz Segura, Domingo; Santamaría, Luis; Ramos Ridao, Ángel Fermín; Revilla, Eloy; Bonet García, Francisco Javier; Sofia Vaz, AnaEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Crowd-sourced photos Cultural ecosystem services Doñana Decision making Protected areas Sierra Nevada
Fecha
2020Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Moreno Llorca, Ricardo Antonio et al. Science of The Total Environment Volume 737, 1 October 2020, 140067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140067
Resumen
Monitoring visitor dynamics and their nature-based experiences is an important dimension in the conservation
management of protected areas. In the current digital age, the content analysis of social media information is
being increasingly used in such a context. However, research testing whether social media content analysis provides
similar information to that obtained from stated preference methods is lacking. We aimed to identify differences
in the classification of tourist profiles and nature-based experiences, both from online social surveys
and photo content analysis. Our approach targeted Flickr's social media users visiting two Biosphere Reserves
in Southern Europe: Doñana and Sierra Nevada.We manually classified the main content of Flickr photos considering
different categories of tourist profiles and nature-based experiences. Concurrently, we distributed online
surveys to Flickr users responsible for those photos and gathered their self-stated classification of tourist profiles
and experiences. Finally, we compared the classification results from both content analysis and online surveys
using multiple congruence metrics and tests. Overall, we found both matches and mismatches between the results from content analysis and online surveys depending on the categories of tourist profiles and their experiences.
“Landscape and species” was the only category with consistent matches between content analysis and
online surveys for both tourist profiles and nature-based experiences.Wesuggest that conclusions based on content
analysis or online surveys alone can lead to incomplete information. Instead, the adoption of both content
analysis and online surveys should provide complementary perspectives for the monitoring of nature's cultural
capital.