Intake and Dietary Food Sources of Fibre in Spain: Differences with Regard to the Prevalence of Excess Body Weight and Abdominal Obesity in Adults of the ANIBES Study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
González Rodríguez, Liliana G.; Perea Sánchez, José Miguel; Aranceta-Bartrina, Javier; Gil Hernández, Ángel; González Gross, Marcela; Serra-Majem, Lluis; Varela-Moreiras, Gregorio; Ortega, Rosa M.Editorial
MDPI
Materia
Fibre Food sources Obesity
Fecha
2017-03-25Referencia bibliográfica
González-Rodríguez, L.G.; Perea Sánchez, J.M.; Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; Gil, Á.; González-Gross, M.; Serra-Majem, L.; Varela-Moreiras, G.; Ortega, R.M. Intake and Dietary Food Sources of Fibre in Spain: Differences with Regard to the Prevalence of Excess Body Weight and Abdominal Obesity in Adults of the ANIBES Study. Nutrients 2017, 9, 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9040326
Resumen
The aim was to study the intake and food sources of fibre in a representative sample
of Spanish adults and to analyse its association with excess body weight and abdominal obesity.
A sample of 1655 adults (18–64 years) from the ANIBES (“Anthropometric data, macronutrients and
micronutrients intake, practice of physical activity, socioeconomic data and lifestyles”) cross-sectional
study was analysed. Fibre intake and dietary food sources were determined by using a three-day
dietary record. Misreporters were identified using the protocol of the European Food Safety Authority.
Mean (standard deviation) fibre intakewas 12.59 (5.66) g/day in thewhole sample and 15.88 (6.29) g/day
in the plausible reporters. Mean fibre intake, both in the whole sample and the plausible reporters, was
below the adequate intake established by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the Institute
of Medicine of the United States (IOM). Main fibre dietary food sources were grains, followed by
vegetables, fruits, and pulses. In the whole sample, considering sex, and after adjusting for age and
physical activity, mean (standard error) fibre intake (adjusted by energy intake) was higher in subjects
who had normal weight (NW) 13.40 (0.184) g/day, without abdominal obesity 13.56 (0.192) g/day or
without excess body weight and/or abdominal obesity 13.56 (0.207) g/day compared to those who
were overweight (OW) 12.31 (0.195) g/day, p < 0.001 or obese (OB) 11.83 (0.266) g/day, p < 0.001,
with abdominal obesity 12.09 (0.157) g/day, p < 0.001 or with excess body weight and/or abdominal
obesity 12.22 (0.148) g/day, p < 0.001. There were no significant differences in relation with the fibre intake according to the body mass index (BMI), presence or absence of abdominal obesity or excess
body weight and/or abdominal obesity in the plausible reporters. Fibre from afternoon snacks was
higher in subjects with NW (6.92%) and without abdominal obesity (6.97%) or without excess body
weight and/or abdominal obesity (7.20%), than those with OW (5.30%), p < 0.05 or OB (4.79%),
p < 0.05, with abdominal obesity (5.18%), p < 0.01, or with excess body weight and/or abdominal
obesity (5.21%), p < 0.01, in the whole sample. Conversely, these differences were not observed in the
plausible reporters. The present study demonstrates an insufficient fibre intake both in the whole
sample and in the plausible reporters and confirms its association with excess body weight and
abdominal obesity only when the whole sample was considered.