• español 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Ver ítem 
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Grupo: Economía Pública y Globalización (SEJ393)
  • SEJ393 - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Grupo: Economía Pública y Globalización (SEJ393)
  • SEJ393 - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Shutting down to save lives: A regression discontinuity analysis of non-essential business closure

[PDF] Artículo principal (2.699Mb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/95231
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101925
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Gaggero, Alessio; Mesa-Pedrazas, Ángela; Fernández Pérez, Ángel
Editorial
Elsevier
Materia
COVID-19
 
Non-essential business closure
 
Spain
 
14-Day infection rate
 
COVID-19 cases and deaths
 
Regression discontinuity
 
Fecha
2024-08-01
Referencia bibliográfica
Gaggero, Alessio, Mesa-Pedrazas, Ángela, & Fernández-Pérez, Ángel (2024). Shutting down to save lives: A regression discontinuity analysis of non-essential business closure. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 94, 101925.
Resumen
This article quantifies the impact of the non-essential business closure policy implemented in the Spanish region of Andalusia during the COVID-19 pandemic between January and May 2021. Taking advantage of the fact that municipalities were assigned a two-week closure of non-essential businesses on the basis of whether the 14-day infection rate (per 100,000 inhabitants) was above a predetermined cutoff value of 1,000, we use a regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal impact of the policy on new COVID-19 cases and deaths. Using weekly administrative data, the estimates suggest that, on average, the policy produced a 23 percent reduction in new COVID-19 cases and a 2 percent decrease in new COVID-19 deaths. Notably, the heterogeneity analysis reveals that the policy was more effective in rural areas than in urban areas. Overall, this study provides compelling evidence that shutting down businesses served as an effective tool to counter the COVID-19 pandemic.
Colecciones
  • SEJ393 - Artículos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Listar

Todo DIGIBUGComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGREsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciación

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contacto | Sugerencias